Legal Opinion
Gloucester Holding Corp. v. U.S. Tape & Sticky Products, LLC
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 18, 2003No. C.A. 19227PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAMB, Vice Chancellor.
I
This action arises out of an agreement by one company to purchase substantially all of the assets of another. The buyer alleges that during the negotiations leading up to the sale, the seller failed to make several material disclosures regarding certain of the assets to be purchased. As a result of these non-disclosures, the buyer alleges that it was fraudulently induced to enter into the agreement. The buyer also alleges that the seller engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices as proscribed under Massachusetts law. Finally, the buyer argues…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Interim Healthcare, Inc. v. Spherion Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2005
- Mbia Insurance Corporation Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee of Sfc Grantor Trust, Series 2000-1, Sfc Grantor Trust, SeriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.