Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Cass County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1906No. 14,240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the district court for Cass county: Paul Jes-sen, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

This action originated before the board of county commissioners of Cass county on a claim for damages filed by :he Missouri Pacific Railroad Company on account of the mossing of its right of way by a section line road in said :ounty. There is no question involved as to the regularity )f the proceedings in opening the highway, and plaintiff’s fiaim for damages was duly filed in conformity with the statute. Appraisers, duly appointed, awarded plaintiff fie sum of $250 as compensation for the crossing of the •oad over its right of way. The county board, however, ■efused to allow…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Lancaster County v. C., B. & Q. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. N. Y. Eng. R. R. Co's. Appeal From Railroad Comm.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Duval Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Richardson County ex rel. Sheehan v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Armour Co. v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1918
  4. County of McPherson v. United States Railroad AdministrationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Hutter v. Papillion Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API