Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hutter v. Papillion Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1911No. 17,177PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Sarpy county: Alexander C. Troup, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This is an appeal from a decree awarding a writ of mandamus against the Papillion Drainage District requiring it to build and maintain bridges across its ditch where the same crosses certain streets in the village of Papillion.

The relator, Louis Hutter, Sr., pleaded and proved that by reason of the excavation of the ditch he was’prevented from having access by way of Addition street to •his land lying to the south of the ditch, whereon his slaughter-house was situated, and prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued compelling the - respondent to build a bridge or crossing on that street. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Dawson County v. Farmers & Merchants Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cleveland v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Lancaster County v. C., B. & Q. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Heffner v. Cass & Morgan CountiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson County ex rel. Sheehan v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dawson County v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API