Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Representative Certain Employees of the University of Minnesota, Unit 9, Crookston v. University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
This certiorari appeal by the University of Minnesota from the dismissal of a de-certification petition filed by a group of instructional employees at the university’s Crookston campus requires us to consider whether for decertification purposes the Outstate Instructional Unit, also known as Unit 9, is a single unit comprising instructional employees at the Duluth and Crook-ston campuses, or two units, one comprising Duluth instructional employees and another comprising Crookston instructional employees. The Bureau of Mediation Services concluded that Unit 9 is a single…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- County of Scott v. Public Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Independent School District No. 621 v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Certification as Exclusive Representative Service Employees International Union, Local 284 v. University of Minnesota, Unit 8Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re Petition for DecertificationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007