Legal Opinion

Meaders v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 27, 1937No. 5176Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

In their motion for rehearing, appellants, among other things, assert that the case of Converse v. Ringer, 6 Tex.Civ.App. 51, 24 S.W. 705, 708, relied on by us in our opinion in this case, has been overruled by the later case of Blum Land Co. v. Rogers, 11 Tex.Civ.App. 184, 32 S.W. 713, writ of error denied. • We have carefully examined all the cases citing Converse v. Ringer, supra, and we find that a portion of the opinion in that case was criticized in the Blum Case. ' But we also find that the *695holding in Converse v. Ringer, supra, was upheld and approved in Price…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Converse v. RingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Hendricks v. HuffmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Price v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Leon & H. Blum Land Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Hendricks v. HuffmeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API