Legal Opinion

Leon & H. Blum Land Co. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1895No. 919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Nacogdoches. Tried below before Hon. James T. Polley.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

The appellant brought an action of trespass to try title to 288 acres of land, a part of the A. L. Martin survey of 640 acres. The plaintiff’s claim of title is derived through. conveyances from one J. M. Heaslet, who claimed to have purchased from John Rogers, who, it is alleged, acquired title to the land under the operation of the ten years’ statute of limitation. At the time of trial, both Heaslet and John Rogers were dead.

The defendant pleaded not guilty, but neither averred ownership in the land, nor offered proof of an outstanding title. Upon trial of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mhoon v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Converse v. RingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Hartman v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Price v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Meaders v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Rushing v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Texarkana Nat. Bank v. EaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Meaders v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API