Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 14, 2003No. 01-00-01424-CRPublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Lufus Foster, guilty of possession with intent to deliver cocaine weighing between 4 and 200 grams and assessed punishment at five years’ confinement. In six points of error appellant contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence; (2) denying his motion to suppress appellant’s statement; (3) admitting evidence for which the State had failed to establish a proper chain of custody; (4) refusing to rule on certain pretrial motions; (5) refusing to submit a jury charge of the lawfulness of the police conduct;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Oursbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  3. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Edward George McGregor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API