Hamm v. Warden
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Byrnes in the lower court, the application for leave to appeal is denied.
After the application for leave to appeal had been submitted for our consideration the applicant, by letter dated October 27, 1965, forwarded to the clerk of this Court a proposed supplement to his original petition setting forth seven additional reasons why leave should be granted. The questions raised in this supplement are not properly before us, because it is well established that claims not asserted in the lower court will not be considered by this Court on an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schowgurow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Davis v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Byrd v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Lomax v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Smith v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. BroughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Young v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Waller v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Thomas v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966