Legal Opinion

Walton v. PATIL

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2010No. S-08-618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

783 N.W.2d 438 (2010)

279 Neb. 974

Muriel D. WALTON, appellant,

v.

Arun-Angelo PATIL, M.D., appellee.

No. S-08-618.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

June 11, 2010.

Marvin O. Kieckhafer and R. Laubenthal, of Smith Peterson Law Firm, L.L.P., for appellant.

Patrick G. Vipond and William R. Settles, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee.

HEAVICAN, C.J., WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, McCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.

2Per curiam

NATURE OF CASE

Muriel D. Walton sued Arun-Angelo Patil, M.D., alleging that he breached the applicable standard of care during and after a surgical procedure Patil performed on Walton's…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Maresh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rebecca Tatman, Administratrix of the Estate of Monte Tatman Rebecca Tatman, Individually v. Bobby Wayne Collins H & T Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Incontro v. JacobsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. LeRette v. American Medical Security, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Kimminau v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. TriceNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re Appropriation A-7603Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Gallegos v. Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API