Legal Opinion
In re Von Wiegen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 18, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to confirm a Referee’s report which sustained two charges of professional *902misconduct against respondent. Respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New York State by this court on May 27, 1980; he currently resides in Vermont.
The two charges of professional misconduct at issue here arise out of an alleged agreement between respondent and one Jeffrey C. Arnow, whereby Arnow was to solicit clients on behalf of respondent in return for a percentage of respondent’s fees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cordts v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Town of Ulster v. MassaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Oneonta Dress Co. v. Ozona-Usa, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. ScarincioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re RapportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Von WiegenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re LeshawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Von WiegenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993