Legal Opinion
In re Rapport
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 24, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Respondents are partners in a law firm with its main office located in the City of Hudson in Columbia County. Respondent Rapport was admitted to practice by this Court in 1958; respondent Whitbeck was admitted by this Court in 1975.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, accuses respondents of having engaged in improper client solicitation. After a hearing, the Referee sustained the charge but dismissed the last of five supporting specifications.
Petitioner moves to confirm the Referee’s report while respondents have submitted an affidavit in opposition urging…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re KofflerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re von WiegenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re GondelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re KofflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re MeadenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re EhrlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re LeshawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. HankinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
- People v. HankinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999