Villafranco v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Chief Justice.
Guadalupe Villafrancó, his brother Carlos, and Jeffrey Davis were tried by a jury and convicted of rape.1 They appeal, arguing that in two respects the trial court misconstrued Georgia’s rape shield statute, OCGA § 24-2-3 (Code Ann. § 38-202.1), thereby erroneously excluding evidence relevant to their defense. They argue in the alternative that if the trial court correctly construed the statute, it is unconstitutional because it violates their right to confrontation as guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution (Code Ann. § 1-806). Davis v. Alaska,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. GarronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.