Legal Opinion

Kosminoff v. Norwalk Fast Oil, Inc., No. Cv95 0145751 S (Jul. 27, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 27, 1995No. CV95 0145751 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REPLEVIN This case comes to this court as a hearing on a prejudgment remedy of replevin. On June 26, 1995, this court heard the issues and requested briefs. The issue was whether funds on deposit in a bank are subject to an action of replevin under Connecticut General Statutes or law.

The court finds that the general rule in Connecticut is that claimants who have rights to collect a debt do not have the right to replevin money. CT Page 7646

The court finds no Connecticut…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Lovell v. Hammond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. BayBank Connecticut, N.A. v. ThumlertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Walther v. Central Trust Co., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BranchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API