United States v. Richard Charles Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Circuit Judge:
After trial by jury, the defendant Marshall was convicted of the offense charged, the theft of a lawn mower of a value in excess of $100, which was the property of the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 641. Marshall appeals, contending that over his objection hearsay evidence was improperly admitted to prove an essential element of the crime, namely, that in fact a lawn mower had been stolen or was missing from the military post exchange where he worked. Finding merit to this contention, we reverse and remand.
I
The lawn mower was allegedly stolen from the Four Seasons Retail Store…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Martin Willard Houltin and Kenneth B. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ralph MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Luis Oscar Sarmiento-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. William E. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Richard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Yisrael v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.