Legal Opinion

Kaack v. Stanton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1908PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Matagorda County. Tried below before Hon. Wells Thompson.

1Opinion of the Court

McMEANS, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted in behalf of Wm. E. Stanton, alleged to be non compos mentis, by his guardian, Mary J. Worthen, and by Raymond Fretwell and Fannie Fretwell, by their guardian, John Fretwell, against Hy. Kaack, Mrs. W. K. Kaack, feme sole, Dave Kaaclc, Anna Kaack, John Kaack, F. S. Sherer and J. F. Holt, in the ordinary form of an action of trespass to try title, for 320 acres of land in Matagorda County, patented to the heirs of Wm. G. Ewing, and for damages. Defendants answered by plea of not guilty, and also pleaded the statute of limitations of three,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Cammack v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. IvyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Holstein v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Parrish v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. State v. CageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. McDougald v. First Nat. Bank of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Smith v. ErhardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API