Legal Opinion · Dissent

Liberty Corp. v. NCNB National Bank of South Carolina

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1993No. 92-1370Published

1DissentK.K. Hall, Circuit Judge

Because I conclude that the Wrongful Death Act’s anti-subrogation provision, N.C.Gen.Stat. § 28A-18-2(a), “relates to” the operation of Liberty’s ERISA Plan (“Plan”), I dissent.

I

After Mr. Bristow’s accident, the Plan paid $93,829.50 in medical bills on his behalf. Under the North Carolina Wrongful Death Act, Bristow’s personal representative had the right to recover all of these medical costs from the tortfeasor who injured Bristow. N.C.Gen.Stat. § 28A-18-2(b) (“Damages recoverable for death by wrongful act include: (1) Expenses for care, treatment and hospitalization incident to the injury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. Baxter v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API