Liberty Corp. v. NCNB National Bank of South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentK.K. Hall, Circuit Judge
Because I conclude that the Wrongful Death Act’s anti-subrogation provision, N.C.Gen.Stat. § 28A-18-2(a), “relates to” the operation of Liberty’s ERISA Plan (“Plan”), I dissent.
I
After Mr. Bristow’s accident, the Plan paid $93,829.50 in medical bills on his behalf. Under the North Carolina Wrongful Death Act, Bristow’s personal representative had the right to recover all of these medical costs from the tortfeasor who injured Bristow. N.C.Gen.Stat. § 28A-18-2(b) (“Damages recoverable for death by wrongful act include: (1) Expenses for care, treatment and hospitalization incident to the injury…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Baxter v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.