Legal Opinion

Smith v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2017No. CC 130202067; CA A155336; SC S063358PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

After suffering permanent brain damage from a stroke, plaintiff Joseph Smith brought this medical negligence action, alleging that, because doctors had not taken proper steps to follow up on his complaints of stroke symptoms, he lost a chance for treatment that, in one-third of cases, provides a patient with no or reduced complications following the stroke. Reviewing the complaint on its face, the trial court agreed with defendants that plaintiff had failed to state a claim under Oregon law. The court entered a judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice, which the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Charles Norman, Jr. v. Anderson Regional Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Martineau v. McKenzie-Willamette Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Angela Connolly; Dr. Nicholas Connolly; A.C., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Angela Connolly v. City of Bend; Officer Jeremy Avery; Dr. Clayton Garthe; Central Oregon Emergency Physicians LLC; St. Charles Health Systems, Inc.; Corporal Jared Wiebold; Does 1–10District Court, D. Oregon · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API