Legal Opinion

Pecover v. Electronics Arts Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 5, 2009No. C 08-2820 VRWPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Geoffrey Pecover purchased an interactive video game software product entitled Madden NFL from a Best Buy store in Washington, D C; plaintiff Jeffrey Lawrence purchased a licensed copy of Madden NFL from a store in California. Together plaintiffs now seek to represent a class and prosecute an action on behalf of all Madden NFL purchasers in the United States. Electronic Arts, Inc (EA) produces Madden NFL.

Plaintiffs allege that EA foreclosed competition in a market for interactive football software by acquiring, in separate agreements, exclusive…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Song Fi, Inc. v. Google, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Herguan University v. Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Clear Connection Corp. v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API