Legal Opinion

Donald Nichols v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 10, 2012No. 11-3280UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Donald Nichols, a prisoner serving a period of incarceration pursuant to a federal criminal sentence, appeals the District Court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We will affirm.

Nichols argued in his counseled petition that the United States Government had committed a “clear breach” of his plea agreement by housing him at a federal facility instead of the allegedly agreed-upon state facility, thereby violating his due-process rights. Insisting that specific performance of the plea agreement would not be “appropriate in the instant matter because the [plea…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Mario Lenardo Cradle v. United States of America, Ex Rel. John Miner, Warden, Allenwood Federal Prison CampCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Person Trust(s) ex rel. Young, Johnny; Savage, Paul; and Preferred Name Israel Zadock, et al. v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors; Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia; and U.S. TreasuryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Viprino v. SpauldingDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API