Roy Rodgers v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice EVANS.
A jury found appellant Roy Rodgers guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a young child and assessed punishment at seventy years’ imprisonment. Appellant contends the trial court erred by allowing the jury to “change” its guilt/innocence verdict during the punishment phase of trial. He also complains about a forensic interviewer testifying as the outcry witness and the sufficiency of the evidence to support, the trial court’s cost award of $239. Concluding appellant’s points of error lack merit, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
The complaining…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson, Manley DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ellison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Coronel, Israel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Ex Parte McIverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Richard B. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Albert L. Flores v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
- Armando Rodriguez Zuniga v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Benjamin Benge v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.