Legal Opinion

In re Petition of Conservation Law Foundation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 20, 2018No. 2017-162PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. The question in this case is whether steep increases in project cost estimates for the Addison Natural Gas Project, combined with changes in energy markets, create a "substantial change" such that Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. (VGS) must secure an amended certificate of public good under Public Utility Commission Rule 5.408. In ruling on Conservation Law Foundation's (CLF) separate petition for declaratory relief, distinct from post-judgment review of the Commission's certificate of public good, the Commission held that increased cost estimates for VGS's natural gas pipeline project, coupled…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. In re Williston Inn GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. Vermont National Telephone Company v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. In Re Simone McNamerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  4. In re Construction & Operation of a Meteorological TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. In re Investigation to Review the Avoided Costs that Serve as Prices for the Standard-Offer Program in 2020 (Allco Renewable Energy Limited & PLH LLC, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API