Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Zeimetz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-0737PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.
Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairyland) and Protective Insurance Company (Protec tive) appeal from an order which granted the plaintiffs' motion to strike the insurance companies' defense of non-permissive use of a vehicle. Dairyland and Protective raise a number of issues regarding part of Wisconsin's safety responsibility law, sec. 344.15, Stats. We conclude that Dairyland, as insurer of the operator of the vehicle, is not subject to estoppel under sec. 344.15(5), and therefore we reverse the order as to it. We also reverse the order as to Protective for evidentiary reasons.
FACTS
A vehicle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Midwest Mutual Insurance v. NicolazziCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Suburban State Bank v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake v. HoagWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. City of La CrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nischke v. Farmers & Merchants Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Cardinal v. Leader National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Nischke v. Farmers & Merchants Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995