Gray v. Joint Rural High School District No. 9
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thielé, J.:
The present appeals grow out of actions brought to enjoin issuance and sale of school district bonds, and under circumstances later discussed.
Although only inferentially alleged, in the amended petitions later mentioned, the territory of Joint Rural High School District No. 9, Osage and Franklin counties, hereafter referred to as District 9, and the territory of Joint Common School District No. 30, Osage and Franklin counties, hereafter referred to as District 30, overlap. In April, 1954, the school boards of the two districts agreed to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Kansas Electric Power Co. v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- City of Oswego v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Board of Education v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- State Ex Rel. McAnarney v. Rural High School District No. 7Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDonald v. Joint Rural High School District No. 9Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- West v. Unified School District No. 346Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Baker v. Unified School District No. 346Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Williams v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956