Legal Opinion

Cox v. United Technologies, Essex Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 31, 1986No. 58,350PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the district court wherein it was held that an employee covered by a collective bargaining agreement may not maintain a tort action against his employer for alleged retaliatory discharge for filing a workers’ compensation claim.

The issue before us is a question of law. The factual background from which this litigation arises may be summarized as follows. Plaintiff Terry Cox was an employee of defendant United Technologies, Essex Group, Inc., in 1982, serving as a fine-wire operator.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Midgett v. Sackett-Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Phillips v. Babcock & WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gary L. Lamb v. Briggs Manufacturing, a Division of the Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Provens v. Stark County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Polson v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API