Legal Opinion

United States v. Kennard Carter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2005No. 03-10377PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge.

Kennard Carter appeals the imposition of a sentence enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline § 2K2.1(b)(4), which mandates a two-point offense-level enhancement for certain firearms offenses when any firearm involved has an altered or obliterated serial number. This case requires us, as a matter of first impression, to construe the meaning of the phrase “altered or obliterated” as used in Guideline § 2K2.1(b)(4).

We hold that, for the purposes of Guideline § 2K2.1(b)(4), a firearm’s serial number is “altered or obliterated” when it is materially…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Tommie Harris v. K. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Serrano-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. Talamantes v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API