Legal Opinion
Hometown Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Moseley Securities Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 29, 1988No. 88 C 3317PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts I and IV of the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
Plaintiff Hometown Savings and Loan Association, F.A. (“Hometown”) is a federally chartered savings and loan association located in Winfield, Illinois. Defendant Moseley Securities Corporation (“Moseley”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, New York. This action grows out of a number of allegedly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- First Comics, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. World Color Press, Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Royal Imperial Group, Inc. v. Joseph Blumberg & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Rowe v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Village of Arlington Heights v. PoderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.