Kalish v. Krieger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 26, 1972, after jury trial, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. While the charge might not be considered perfect or a model of precision, it may fairly be termed adequate to instruct the jury with respect to negligence as a proximate cause of the accident, and contributory negligence as a bar to recovery. (Cf. Schmoll v. Luther, 36 A D 2d 996.) The charge must be considered as a whole. So considered, it is concluded that it served to apprise the jury of the necessary principles…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Weed v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Espriel v. New York Downtown HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- De Vito v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Brady v. Harborfields Central School District No. 6Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977