Legal Opinion

Watson v. United States Probation Office

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 17, 2020No. 1:18-cv-03840Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CURTIS LEE WATSON, * Plaintiff * v * Civil Action No. ELH-18-3840 UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, * WILLIAM HENRY, BRETT BJORK * Defendants * *** MEMORANDUM The self-represented plaintiff, Curtis Lee Watson, a federal parolee, has filed a “Civil Rights Complaint,” with exhibits, contesting his federal parole supervision. ECF 1. He has named as defendants the United States Probation Office; William Henry, who was the Chief of that office in the District of Maryland at the time suit was filed; and Probation Officer Brett Bjork.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API