Legal Opinion
Racoosin v. Le Schack & Grodensky, P. C.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin B. Stecher, J.
The plaintiff moves, following a jury trial in which a general verdict was rendered in favor of the defendants, to set aside the verdict, direct the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability, or, alternatively, for a new *630trial. The basis for the motion, principally, is claimed inconsistency between the general verdict and the jury’s answer to one of two interrogatories (CPLR 4111, subd [c]).
The plaintiff was the principal stockholder of several real estate corporations which experienced financial difficulties. It is alleged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Dean v. . KochendorferNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Fischer v. . LangbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Heaney v. PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Gifford v. HarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Bridge C.A.T. Scan Associates v. Ohio-Nuclear Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. GroenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Boyd Brothers Transportation Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Benjamin v. AssadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.