Legal Opinion
Bridge C.A.T. Scan Associates v. Ohio-Nuclear Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 14, 1985No. 84 Civ. 0539 (EW)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Third party defendant John E. Murphy (“Murphy”) moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the claims of Technicare Corporation (“Technicare”) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 56, for summary judgment. The claims against Murphy are the only ones remaining in this action formerly replete with claims and counterclaims by and against numerous parties. Technicare has settled its differences with all other parties to this lawsuit. It opposes Murphy’s motion for dismissal or summary judgment on the grounds noted hereafter.
BACKGROUND
Techni…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- O'BRIEN v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Tew v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Construction Technology v. Lockformer Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Aguirre v. Best Care Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.