Legal Opinion
Pond v. Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 28, 1930No. 6033PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellees brought this action to compel the specific performance of a contract made by E. P. Pond for the sale to them of a building in Juneau, Alaska, dated April 26, 1927, reciting the payment of $1,000 as part payment of the purchase price of $11,000, and providing that the balance should be paid on April 30, 1927. The contract provided that the property should be free and clear of all encumbrances; it recited the fact that the building was occupied by the Winter & Pond Company; it contained an agreement that the appellees, as purchasers, would rent to the seller…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wormley v. WormleySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Fisher v. ShropshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilhoit v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Forno v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Knowles v. MosherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
- Associated Mfrs. Corp. of America v. De JongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Isaac MacHover and Lola MacHover v. Abdrhmin Abdallah and Menrah Abdallah, Mohammed AbdallahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.