Legal Opinion
Ullman v. Santow
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 20, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 A.2d 582 (1960)
Emanuel M. ULLMAN and Louis Bachman, Plaintiffs,
v.
Paul SANTOW and Stephania Santow, Defendants.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
May 4, 1960.
On Reargument May 20, 1960.
Frank J. Miller, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.
Joseph Donald Craven, Wilmington, for defendants.
MARVEL, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiffs, who are owners of homes in Mill Creek Hundred, live in the same zoning district in which the lot in controversy in this case is located. Prior to June 26, 1956, such lot, which is owned by defendants, was zoned R-2 (agricultural and general purpose). On the date indicated,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- MacCrone v. American Capital CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Pratt v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Simkin v. ColeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Reinbacher v. ConlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scarborough v. MAYOR & COUN. OF TOWN OF CHESWOLDCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
- Nathan v. MartinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974