Dye v. Ghann
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
We first pass upon the objection raised by the cross-bill to allowing the plaintiffs in error in the main bill of exceptions to be made parties defendant and to assist in the defense of the suit.
Upon the call of the case for trial, certain persons, averring themselves to be heirs at law of Edward Buford Dye, made an oral motion through their counsel that they be named and included as parties defendant to assist in defending the action. Petitioner’s counsel objected to the motion on the ground that such a motion had to be in writing, and that such persons had not filed written…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Henderson v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Baker v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank in Fairmont v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- First National Bank in Fairmont v. PhillipsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Limbaugh v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Limbaugh v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970