Baker v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is said in the brief filed by counsel for the plaintiffs in error that the only question presented for decision by the writ of error is whether or not these complaining petitioners have any interest in the establishment and probate of a copy of Jimmie Henderson’s purported will. As to this, opposing counsel concur and so do we. Concededly, if these petitioners will not be injured or benefited by the establishment and probate of the alleged copy will, they are therefore strangers to it, and are not proper parties to this litigation. 57…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Jones v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Pierce v. FeltsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Ware v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by13 opinions
- Foster v. CheekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Strother v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Limbaugh v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lavender v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Stith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.