Legal Opinion

Laurence v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 21, 2001No. 2000-295-APPEALPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Did the Family Court err in denying child visitation to a convicted murderer serving a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole? After reviewing the trial justice’s decision, the record in this case, the parties’ written submissions, and their oral arguments, we answer this question in the negative. For the reasons explained below, we are of the opinion that the trial justice acted within his discretion in concluding that it was not in the child’s best interests to allow the imprisoned father to have visitation with the child at this time.

The plaintiff, Norman Laurence…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. TempestSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  2. Suddes v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. State v. CoteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Burrows v. BradySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  5. Seravo v. SeravoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Jonathan MartinezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  2. Norman Laurence v. Rhode Island Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  3. Patricia Pacheco v. Nestor MarulandaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  4. Jeffrey Murray v. Christine JonesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021
  5. Sharon Brooks v. Michael BrooksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API