Legal Opinion

John Pinkowski v. Ralph Coglay, Doing Business as Mohawk Equipment Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 1965No. 14741_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

This diversity action was brought by plaintiff John Pinkowski against defendants, A. B. Arthur and A. J. Nelson, doing business as Arnel Trading (Arnel), Ralph Coglay, doing business as Mohawk Equipment Company (Mohawk) and Fred Keefe.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged he was injured as a result of Keefe’s negligence and that Keefe was an agent of Arnel and Mohawk or, in the alternative, that defendants were engaged in a joint venture. Plaintiff sought recovery of damages for his alleged injuries.

Approximately three months prior to the injury complained of, Mohawk leased a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Carroll v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Harmon v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Babington v. BogdanovicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Rhône-Poulenc Agro S.A. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  3. Baker v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Glass v. Kemper Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Baker v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API