Whitaker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ODOM, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of methamphetamine. The Court of Appeals •reversed for failure to grant appellant adequate time to examine prospective jurors during the jury selection process. Reversible error was found under authority of De La Rosa v. State, 414 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.1967). We find appellant has shown no harm and the trial court’s limitation of appellant’s jury voir dire to fifty minutes was not unreasonable.
In De La Rosa, supra, the record reflected that some of the prospective jurors whom the defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by51 opinions
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Menchaca v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Tamez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Ratliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.