Legal Opinion

Taiyo Corp. v. Sheraton Savannah Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 17, 1995No. 94-8348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants, Taiyo Corporation (Taiyo), Mitchell Rosen and Row, Foltz & Martin, P.C., challenge the dismissal of Taiyo’s complaint for a declaratory judgment against Sheraton Savannah Corporation (Sheraton) filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, as well as the district court’s award of sanctions made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. The court found that the action was brought for an improper purpose and was not warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Johnny R. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cramer v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Miller v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Michael Miller v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Robert Sarhan v. H & H Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Roderick A. Wright v. Branch Banking and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API