Legal Opinion

Polites v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 23, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-31; Court 09-00387PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

POGUE, Chief Judge.

This matter returns to court following a voluntary remand to the Department of Commerce (“the Department” or “Commerce”) to define the exclusion for “finished scaffolding” in the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel pipe from the People’s Republic of China. 1 On remand, Commerce defined “finished scaffolding” as “[cjompleted supported elevated platforms and their completed supporting structures,” or “component parts that enter the United States unassembled as a ‘kit.’ ” Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. OMG, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  4. SMA Surfaces, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  5. Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API