Legal Opinion
Gerald M. Hocking v. Maylee Dubois and Vitousek & Dick Realtors, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1989No. 85-1932PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
Gerald M. Hocking, a disappointed purchaser of a unit in a condominium complex in Hawaii sued the brokers who sold the unit, claiming violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (1982), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1988). He appeals a summary judgment in favor of the brokers.
After a three-judge panel’s decision had reversed the summary judgment,1 the court *1452granted rehearing en banc and the case was reargued on supplemental briefs focused upon the question whether the transaction at the heart of this case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Tamer Salameh v. Tarsadia HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Holden v. HagopianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. Rubera, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. RuberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Raul F. Rodriguez v. Banco Central CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.