Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Turner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1968No. 10670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from a denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He alleges in his petition that prior to his entry of a plea of guilty to a robbery charge in 1958 he was advised of his right to counsel, but was not advised of his right to have counsel appointed in the event he were without funds to employ his own.1

Upon authority of the recently decided case of State v. Workman,2 and for the reasons stated therein, the decision of the lower court is affirmed.

CROCKETT, C. J., and TUCKETT, HENRIOD and ELLETT, JJ., concur.. Citing: Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. ThurlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dyett v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nielsen v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1968
  3. Dyett v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dyett v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API