Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Martz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1888No. 13,384PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

The purpose of this action by appellant is to avoid a decree quieting the title to the land described in the complaint in her father.

So far as it is necessary in this connection to refer to the complaint, the following brief and general summary is sufficient :

Appellant’s mother died intestate in 1864. At the time of her death the fee to the land in dispute here was in her. In 1871, when appellant was a minor, her father, Benjamin Rupert, commenced an action against her to have the title to the laud quieted in him. She was the sole defendant, and, having been duly served with process, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bryson v. McCrearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Davis v. RupeIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Board of Comm'rs v. RuckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Woods v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Moor v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Cunningham v. HelmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Curless v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kaufman v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API