Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cunningham v. Helms

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1893No. 15,828PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

This action was instituted in the court below by the State of Indiana on the relation of Joseph W. Cunningham, appellant, against Albert Helms, trustee of Sugar Creek township, in Hancock county, Indiana, principal, and Benjamin F. Rice, William T. Eaton, William Nichols and Henry C. Nichols, his sureties on his official bond as such officer.

The complaint charges, that at the April election in the year 1888, the defendant, Albert Helms, was elected the trustee of Sugar Creek township, in said county, and that on the 12th day of April, 1888, the said trustee qualified by executing his certain…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Fisk v. Jefferson Police JurySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Rice v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. Flinn v. ParsonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodman v. HalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Bruck v. State Ex Rel. MoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ElbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Sparta School v. MendellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API