Legal Opinion
Mulhens & Kropff, Inc. v. Ferd. Muelhens, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 5, 1930No. 342Published
1Opinion of the Court
43 F.2d 937 (1930)
MULHENS & KROPFF, Inc.,
v.
FERD. MUELHENS, Inc.,
No. 342.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
August 5, 1930.
Manvel Whittemore and Lucius E. Varney, both of New York City (Emory R. Buckner, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Katz & Sommerich, of New York City (Maxwell C. Katz, Milton Handler, Raymond T. Heilpern, and Edwin M. Borchard, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judge.
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The very thorough and able opinion of the District Court sets forth the facts in great detail. We shall repeat them…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baglin v. Cusenier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Vick Medicine Co. v. Vick Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- Maas v. LonstorfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- W. A. Gaines & Co. v. Turner-Looker Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Mulhens & Kropff, Inc. v. Ferd. Muelhens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.