Legal Opinion

Holland v. Jachmann

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 14, 2014No. 1; No. 13-P-280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.

Of significance, we are asked whether attorney’s fees for legal work performed by in-house counsel may be awarded under G. L. c. 93A. We hold that, in the discretion of the trial judge, such fees may be awarded.

The plaintiffs (sometimes referred to collectively as Omniglow) brought the present action against Cyalume Technologies, Inc. (Cyalume), and Emil Jachmann, its chief executive officer (collectively, defendants), seeking to remedy the defendants’ efforts to undermine the plaintiffs’ business. After a seventeen-day, jury-waived trial, the judge found the defendants liable for numerous…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Drywall Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Casavant v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auto Flat Car Crushers, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Parham-Johnson v. Pyramid Builders Assoc., Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API