United States v. Sitzmann
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a pro se motion by defendant Gregory Sitzmann requesting that the Court find that his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel during a hearing that was held on August 16, 2011. The government opposed the motion, and it was discussed at a status conference held on February 1, 2012. Mr. Sitzmann subsequently filed a response to the government’s opposition and later supplemented his motion with additional facts. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be denied. 1
Mr. Sitzmann identifies two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.