General Electric Company v. Hess Brothers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The trial judge makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
I. Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff’s requested Findings of Fact Nos. 1, 2, 4-15, and defendant’s requested Findings of Fact Nos. 2, 6-23, 1 25, and 26 are adopted as the Findings of this court.
Defendant’s requested Findings of Fact Nos. 84-91 are adopted as being •substantially correct (see affidavits attached to the stipulation filed March 29, 1957).
The advertising of defendant preceding and during its sale from August 24 to September 4, 1956, of plaintiff’s fair-traded products at less than…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. KalodnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- General Electric Co. v. Masters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nakahara v. NS 1991 American TrustCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Janel Sales Corp. v. Lanvin Parfums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Texas Co. v. DiGaetanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.