Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Spittler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1942No. 30503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was commenced in district court by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error to recover damages as provided by 23 O. S. 1941 § 72, for the alleged unlawful cutting and removal of timber from plaintiff’s land. Judgment was rendered against the several defendants on separate verdicts, and they appeal.

One Van Tress was the record owner of the premises in question, but the plaintiff was the actual owner by reason of a deed executed by Van Tress which was not recorded. Van Tress died a resident of another state and the defendant Luther Calahan became the administrator of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seal v. BanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Samson Resources Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Waldmann v. WaldmannCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Bagwell v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Buckles v. Triad Energy, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Sarman v. First Judicial District Court ex rel. County of DouglasNevada Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API