Legal Opinion
In re Hanwha Azdel, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 29, 2013No. C.A. 13-mc-93004-MAPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO QUASH AND TO VACATE
PONSOR, District Judge.
On May 8, 2013, this court granted an ex parte motion by Applicants Hanwha Azdel, Inc. (“Azdel”) and Hanwha L & C Corp. (“Hanwha”), (together “Applicants”), for an order directing Crane & Co., Inc., to produce documents for use in an international arbitration proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. On May 23, 2013, SA-BIO Innovative Plastics U.S. LLC (“SA-BIC-IP” or “Intervenor”) moved to intervene in this matter to quash the subpoena. (Dkt. No. 12.) On August 9, 2013, Magistrate Judge Kenneth P.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re Babcock Borsig AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Gushlak v. Gushlak Gushlak v. FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- In Re Application of Chevron Cor.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010