Legal Opinion

Donner v. Deere & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1993No. 3-93-0400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

The plaintiff, Michael L. Donner, retained attorney Marc A. Taxman to file this personal injury suit against the defendants, Deere & Company and Western Structural Company. The suit progressed as scheduled and was near trial when attorney Taxman failed to appear at a pretrial conference scheduled for April 8, 1993. Thereupon, the trial court dismissed the cause of action with prejudice as a sanction pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 218 and 219(c) (134 Ill. 2d Rules 218, 219(c)). The plaintiff appeals. We reverse because the drastic sanction of dismissal with prejudice should only be imposed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kubian v. LabinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Nixon v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Wilkins v. T. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Simmons v. ShimekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Senese v. Climatemp, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Hastings v. GulledgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Cronin v. Kottke AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Hastings v. GulledgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Senses v. Climatemp, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API